Sources
Works and records cited in this dossier. Numbered references in the account lead to entries here.
- Lynd to Fackenthal on Loose Affiliation, 25 June 1934 Robert S. Lynd to Frank D. Fackenthal. 25 June 1934.
- Wiggershaus Columbia Invitation Reconstruction Rolf Wiggershaus. 1995 English edition.
Complete existing research record
Columbia 1934 role
Advocated the Institute's Columbia relationship and described the contemplated arrangement as a very loose affiliation with complete Institute autonomy.
Limit
A reported proposal for Columbia faculty representation on the Institute board is not proof that appointments occurred.
Evidence
Research Memo: Columbia's 1934 Housing and Affiliation of the Institute for Social Research. Claim-level source records are linked from the event and task.
Why this person matters
Advocated for a loose Columbia affiliation that preserved the Institute's autonomy.
Verification boundary
Membership, employment, collaboration, and influence are recorded as different relationship types. Shared membership is preserved as evidence but is not treated as proof of agreement or influence by itself.
Verified relationship
advocatedForInstitute: Institute for Social Research
Evidence basis
Research Memo: Frankfurt Institute to Columbia