The Long
Insurgency

Source

Counterrevolution and Revolt

This page lists available editions and the published claims that cite this source.

Creator
Herbert Marcuse
Original publication
1972
Type
Book

Source website

Editions and holdings

  • Second printing, November 1972

    November 1972 (second printing)

Where this source is used

  1. In Counterrevolution and Revolt (1972), Marcuse cites Prophets of Deceit alongside The Authoritarian Personality to support his interpretation of aggression toward minorities and radicals in the United States, immediately before calling for radical-left political education; the following pages identify Marxian analysis and a socialist alternative.

    Read Herbert Marcuse

    Supporting evidence

    Source locator: Printed pp. 28–30; archive PDF pp. 39–41. Title and copyright: PDF pp. 2–3.

    Printed p. 28 identifies both books in the joint footnote supporting the preceding interpretation. The next paragraph prescribes radical-left political education; pp. 29–30 explicitly identify Marxian analysis and the socialist aim. The joint footnote does not isolate each cited book’s individual contribution. This establishes Marcuse’s argumentative use, not activist implementation, the F-scale’s adoption, movement-wide uptake, political effects, or ideological agreement by the earlier authors or sponsor.

  2. In Counterrevolution and Revolt (1972), Marcuse cites The Authoritarian Personality alongside Prophets of Deceit to support his interpretation of aggression toward minorities and radicals in the United States, immediately before calling for radical-left political education; the following pages identify Marxian analysis and a socialist alternative.

    Read Herbert Marcuse

    Supporting evidence

    Source locator: Printed pp. 28–30; archive PDF pp. 39–41. Title and copyright: PDF pp. 2–3.

    Printed p. 28 identifies both books in the joint footnote supporting the preceding interpretation. The next paragraph prescribes radical-left political education; pp. 29–30 explicitly identify Marxian analysis and the socialist aim. The joint footnote does not isolate each cited book’s individual contribution. This establishes Marcuse’s argumentative use, not activist implementation, the F-scale’s adoption, movement-wide uptake, political effects, or ideological agreement by the earlier authors or sponsor.