An older history, a new question
How could a republic give way to authoritarian rule? Marcuse approached that question through Marx’s account of the French Revolution of 1848 and the rise of Louis Bonaparte. His epilogue to a new German edition asked what that history could reveal after the experience of twentieth-century fascism.
Marcuse argued that the danger could develop within the social order itself. He read Marx’s account as showing a property-owning class turning away from liberal institutions when those institutions threatened its power. The promises of freedom and equality could reach beyond the limits their original supporters were willing to accept.
Promises escape their original limits
In Marcuse’s reading, political discussion did not stay inside parliament. It continued in the press and in public life. Rights won in earlier struggles could become demands for further change.
That was the problem he wanted readers to follow: institutions built to secure an existing order could also provide ways to challenge it. His account made the retreat from political freedom part of a conflict within that order.
The argument reaches another readership
Radical America printed the epilogue in its July–August 1969 issue, in an English translation credited to Arthur Mitzman. Readers encountered Marcuse applying Marx’s historical analysis to questions about power, freedom and repression in their own century.
At the close, Marcuse addressed young people and others resisting exploitation and repression. He argued that Marx’s text remained relevant to them. The reprint brought that argument into the journal; tracing what readers subsequently did with it is the next research step.
Sources
Herbert Marcuse, Epilogue to the New German Edition of Marx’s Eighteenth Brumaire , Radical America 3, no. 4 (July–August 1969), pp. 55–59. The account above attributes the interpretation to Marcuse. Pages 55–56 establish the argument about liberal institutions; p. 59 addresses the text’s continuing relevance and names Arthur Mitzman as translator.
The permission credit identifies the original publisher and 1965 copyright. Publication establishes the journal’s circulation of this text, not readers’ agreement or a documented effect on later organizing.
Explore Arthur Mitzman
Mitzman translates the epilogue
The journal credits Arthur Mitzman with the English translation. Translation is the documented link here: it made Marcuse’s text available in these English-language pages. The credit also records permission from Marcuse and the original publisher.
More about Arthur Mitzman
Documented reception role
Translator of Marcuse's Brumaire epilogue.
Evidence and limit
See Research Memo: Marcuse Publication Reception in SDS, REP, New Left Notes, and Radical America. This role does not establish SDS membership, REP authority, or organizational adoption unless separately documented.
Connection: Radical America 3.4: Marcuse Brumaire epilogue reprint translated by Arthur Mitzman.
Selected connection
Radical America 3.4: Marcuse Brumaire epilogue reprint translated by Arthur Mitzman.
Radical America 3.4: Marcuse Brumaire epilogue reprint → Arthur Mitzman · Translated by
Claim tier: documented · Confidence: high
What the record establishes
Documented
What this does not establish
Translation credit only.
Sources and locators
Locator: Not recorded
Role: supports
translation credit; locator: Radical America 3, no. 4 (July-August 1969), pp. 55-59
Citation details
Connection: REL-000370
Radical America 3.4: Marcuse Brumaire epilogue reprint· SRC-000178
Stored claim: Radical America 3.4: Marcuse Brumaire epilogue reprint translatedBy Arthur Mitzman.
1 stored evidence references; 1 available here.
Link to this connectionRecord citation
Arthur Mitzman · PER-000062